Join the Conversation on
7 people
0 stories
32 posts
Note: The hashtags you follow are publicly viewable on your profile; you can change this at any time.
  • Explore Our Newsletters
  • What's New in journalism
    Community Voices

    How Presentation Affects Representation - #DwhellOnIt Ep. 56

    📺 -

    🗣 - "Taylor Lakhryst was an undecided voter who participated in a #CBC program called Face to Face during last year's federal election campaign. While being on the show gave her a chance to ask questions of a party leader, she felt CBC's production choices spoiled the experience by making her appear inept and powerless."

    ❓ - What's #DwhellOnIt ?

    👀 - Dwhell On It is a series where I answer your questions about my lived experience as a #trans woman!

    📺 - A new episode gets uploaded every week! -

    ‼️ - Get engaged!

    ➕ - Subscribe for more episodes & similar #Content ! -

    ✉️ - #Comment w/ thoughts & questions!

    👍🏻 - Please like & #Share !

    🔖 - Bookmarks!

    "While you expressed #Gratitude for the #Opportunity to provide visibility on the subject of abuse toward the 2SLBGTQIA+ #Community , you felt that #CBC made choices which diluted your appearance. It left you feeling, if not misrepresented, then underrepresented."

    It feels as if #CBC chose to represent me as what I interpret as inept, powerless, and stuck with candy-coated concerns because who I am isn't palatable enough for Canadians who can't cope that #people such as myself strive to inspire and create #change .

    #social platforms highlighted my segment as being of the utmost importance on an issue that had not been placed front and centre in the campaign until my appearance.

    I continued to focus much of my argument on the treatment of my introductory video. I emphasized how problematic it was that this video highlighted "my love for #Sports and karaoke" while omitting more substantive #Comments about the importance of placing responsibility for bigotry and hate-based abuse on the abusers rather than the victims.

    "I'm an undecided voter because" and "Let's be #leaders …" were extracted from two completely different sections of what I provided. #CBC created that line and not me, and I'm not sure if that is conducive to "accuracy."

    "You stated that you followed all the directives given to you in advance by producers, yet you were the only one of the four participants given less than 40 seconds of airtime."

    "You also reiterated that #CBC exercised poor judgment when it failed to include your exchange about pronouns with #ErinOToole .”

    #CBC watered me down and presented me with the safest, most palatable and most comfortable image they could build based on the information I provided.

    "Your complaint is, first and foremost, a reminder that the stories journalists tell are not really "theirs." They are the stories of real #people with real lives, ambitions, and concerns."

    Journalistic Standards and Practices covers much ground regarding ethical #Journalism but doesn't cover specific circumstances.

    "There is more debate to be had about editing your introductory video … it's clear that those producers took two risks with your video."

    "On your frustration that the #question you asked on the show was "negotiated," … I worried it meant that programmers were forcing you to ask the questions that they wanted."

    🔗 - Links!

    How Presentation Affects Representation -

    Your Friends Appreciate a Random Check-In Call or Text More Than You Realize -

    What four undecided voters asked #ErinOToole | Face to Face 2021 -

    #Media and #Journalism are transphobic. I was on #CBC News: The National Face to Face -

    #Canada Voted In Favour of Policing Women's Bodies! -

    Is there anything that #people expect you to be good at but are very bad at? -

    #CBC News: The National | #ErinOToole , Alberta's deadly COVID-19 surge, TIFF returns -

    👀 - Create #change !  

    📣 - End anti-2SLGBTQIA+ abuse! -

    📣 - You can #help ! Everything inspiring HireWheller stays ongoing - biased systems, ignorant platforms, violent abusers & isolated victims.

    📣 - Grassroots #power comes from its #people ! Get involved or refer others you know to challenge systemic violence & oppression!

    💻 - Connect!

    @HireWheller: A grassroots group to #help the 2SLGBTQIA+ #Community overcome often-minimized struggles.



    #Twitter :

    👱🏼‍♀️ - Look me up!

    TaylorLakhryst: #Transgender woman, advocate, INFJ, ♊️, she/her/hers 🏳️‍⚧️


    📒 - Alt information

    * Text: Dwhell on it w/ Taylor Lakhryst Ep. 56 - How Presentation Affects Representation - HIREWHELLER

    * Description: A blonde woman wearing a black sweater is smiling & sitting in front of a beige wall. There is white text with a yellow & purple accent.

    * Captions: Automated

    #Gratitude #Opportunity #social #Sports #Comments #leaders #canadian #gender #grateful #interview #manitoba #News #Out #Respect #Safety #Success #winnipeg #Youtube #active #Activism #Anxiety #athlete #Business #causes #Charity #donate #Energy #equality #Fundraising #Lesbian #LGBT #LGBTQ #Kindness #marketing #Media #nonbinary #philanthropy #Pride

    Leslie A. Zukor

    New York Times Coverage of ADA Lawsuits Isn't Journalistic Neutrality

    “Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.” So declared Elie Wiesel in his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech. No clearer is this maxim borne out than in journalism as it pertains to disability rights. For far too long, neutrality in news reporting has been a cover for framing disabled people’s access needs in the least charitable light. On Sunday, July 25, The New York Times Magazine printed an article where disability needs and those who sue for them were pitted against the livelihoods of business owners. Entitled “The Man Who Filed More Than 180 Disability Lawsuits: Is it profiteering — or justice?” author Lauren Markham framed the choice as one between siding with “serial” A.D.A. litigants like Albert Dytch and small business owners, who may not even be cognizant that they are breaking the law. Focusing on how inaccessible society still is after 31 years of the Americans With Disabilities Act and then asking for a comment from an offending business owner would have been good journalistic practice, highlighting the battle for disability justice but giving the establishment a chance to share its side of the story. That would have been the perfect example of holding oppressive societal structures to account, but being fair enough to allow all parties to comment. Instead, Markham chose balance, the sort of neutrality between justice and injustice that does not acknowledge that even if plaintiffs profit from ADA lawsuits and even if business owners do not know that their buildings are inaccessible, a society where disabled people don’t have the ability to eat in a restaurant is still an unjust one. After all, whether a mom and pop business knows it is violating the law is immaterial to the reality that it is one cog in an oppressive machine of inaccessibility for disabled individuals, which culminates in them having less ability to enjoy their lives than the nondisabled majority. The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics specifies that reporters should, “Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.” The New York Times Magazine article violates this principle by not holding the powerful structural inequities and those who contribute to them to account, instead portraying accessibility lawsuits as if they were a debate, not a necessity in ensuring a just society. While disabled people are not voiceless, their needs could certainly be amplified by not resorting to false dichotomies. Markham cites the astronomical growth of ADA lawsuits as proof that litigants may be exploiting the system, instead of framing the issue as a matter of a growing clamor for disability justice. “In 2012, plaintiffs filed 2,495 Title III cases in federal court,” she wrote. “By 2017, that had more than tripled to 7,663 cases — more than half of which were filed in California or Florida, whose state laws can be particularly beneficial to ADA plaintiffs.” Regardless of the pecuniary motive, creating a society where disabled people can go anywhere and have access to all the same services as nondisabled individuals should be the emphasis of the reporting, not potentially lining the pockets of plaintiffs. A better framing of the article would have been, “Civil Rights Champions: Inside the Battles of the Disabled Litigants Ensuring That Businesses Are Accessible for All.” The emphasis would have been on disability justice, not on money, and on why the lawsuits are important, regardless of how many an individual plaintiff or law firm files. In writing about justice for oppressed groups, the framing of an article makes all the difference — especially for disabled people during Disability Pride Month. Moreover, it is consequential in how the public views matters of equity. Furthermore, when news reporting reaches large audiences, it carries a special responsibility — especially for an influential brand such as The New York Times. That duty is to strive for holding the powerful to account, instead of providing a misleading sense of balance that serves only to hinder marginalized populations like disabled people.